Design partners

Bring one real release. Keep everything it produces.

We’re inviting a small number of design partners for validation work arranged directly: you bring a release you actually ship, the audit runs offline in your environment, and every artifact stays with you. Pricing is under validation; the offline CLI costs nothing to trial, and v0.5.0 is available to approved private testers rather than as a public download. No organisation is represented on this site as a customer.

Illustrative brand image, synthetic: evidence artifacts converging into a single release pack
Your product, one real release — that’s the whole first engagement · illustrative brand image, synthetic

Five ways to write to us

One inbox, five subjects — pick the one that fits.

Every route lands at hello@sbomflow.com. A person reads it and answers yes, no or not yet; there is no form behind this page and no sequence waiting on the other side of it.

Evaluate one release
You have a firmware or software release and want to see what the evidence record looks like for it. Say what you build, on which build system, and which release you would point it at. Write with this subject
Become a design partner
You want to shape the product against your releases over time — on the release-evidence, post-market or AI-evidence track — and can bring a real build and a named engineer. Write with this subject
Academic or research discussion
Researchers and lecturers: the evidence-first philosophy, reproducibility boundaries, testable claims and honest limitations — and what a course or a study could do with them. Write with this subject
Investment conversation
This site states no customers, traction, revenue or funding. A conversation starts from the category, the stage and the founder, and from the design-partner opportunity described on this page. Write with this subject
General questions
Anything else — fit, the documentation, the build, or whether it is worth writing at all. Write with this subject

Before you write to us

Who this fits — and who it doesn’t, yet.

A strong fit today

  • Connected-device and embedded manufacturers — embedded Linux, industrial IoT, robotics, cameras, building controls, network appliances
  • Firmware CI in place (or nearly), and someone who owns product security
  • Selling into the EU with CRA obligations on the horizon — or fielding customer SBOM and security questionnaires now
  • PSIRT or product-security leads who want to shape the experimental post-market preview
  • Teams shipping AI-enabled products who want to shape the AI Evidence track

Probably not, yet

  • Pure-SaaS teams with no device, firmware, or shipped-release story
  • Teams that need a hosted multi-tenant platform, SSO/SCIM, or an auditor portal today — that surface doesn’t exist yet
  • Anyone shopping for a compliance certificate — no tool can honestly sell you one

The evaluation journey

Six steps, from one real release to structured feedback.

This is the whole first engagement. It runs on your build, in your environment, and ends with artifacts you hold and feedback we act on.

1 · Bring one representative product release

A firmware or software build you actually ship, and a named engineer who knows it. Not a demo repository.

2 · Identify the evidence you produce today

Where the SBOMs, scan results, VEX decisions, test results and approvals for that release currently live — and which of them trace to the exact build.

3 · Run SBOMFlow in a controlled environment

Offline, in your environment, on the tester build. Nothing is hosted, no account is created, and nothing is sent to us.

4 · Inspect the resulting record

Read the evidence pack the way your reviewer would: what was observed, what was refused, and what still needs a human decision.

5 · Identify gaps and workflow improvements

Where the evidence was wrong, thin or unreadable; which warnings were noise; what your build system does that the scan did not understand; what you could not do at all.

6 · Provide structured feedback

Written reactions against the real record — the design part of design partner. It shapes what we build next, with its status labelled honestly wherever it appears.

Private tester access

Run v0.5.0 on your own release, before it is public.

v0.5.0 is a certified private tester build with no known release-blocking defects, subject to the documented restrictions. It is not on PyPI and there is no public download — approved testers receive it through a controlled channel. This is a testing programme, not a purchase: nothing below is a paid arrangement, and no organisation is being represented as a customer.

Who it is for

Teams that ship connected products and can point the tool at a real firmware or software build — not a demo repository. You need Python 3.11 or newer and a build tree. There is nothing to host, no account to create, and no data to send us.

What you receive

The v0.5.0 wheel and its SHA-256, install instructions that work with the package index switched off, the public documentation set, and a written list of the restrictions this build ships under. You install it yourself and run it in your own environment.

What feedback helps most

Where the evidence was wrong, thin, or unreadable for the person who had to review it. Which warnings were noise. What your build system does that the scan did not understand. And what you could not do at all — an unusable path is more useful to us than a working one.

The restrictions, stated up front:

  • The build is unsigned, and no build service attested it. The SHA-256 lets you confirm the bytes are the ones the build produced; it is not a signature and says nothing about who produced them.
  • Reproducibility was established on one machine, one interpreter and one operating system — same-environment reproducibility, not a cross-platform claim.
  • Verified platforms are Linux, macOS on Apple Silicon, and Windows via WSL. Native Windows is unverified.
  • “No known release-blocking defects” means the defects found were closed or written down, not that none remains — which is not the same as error-free.
  • Post-market and passport workflows are experimental previews, and AI Evidence is in development — some AI groundwork in this release has no operator path yet.
  • Everything we publish as proof of what the tool can do is synthetic or open-source. Nothing on this site is customer validation, and we will not describe it as such.

To ask for access, email hello@sbomflow.com and say what you build, on which build system, and what release you would point it at. A person reads that inbox and will answer yes, no, or not yet. How the build was verified, and what that verification did not establish, is set out on the trust centre.

Once you have the tester build

One command detects the project, scaffolds a config it refuses to overwrite, and runs a fully offline audit. It discloses the scan root, the detected inputs and its network posture before the first write — nothing happens to your tree that you have not been shown first.

$ sbomflow quickstart .
Your first offline audit, step by step

Engagements

Four ways to work with us.

Available today

Release Evidence Sprint

  • Build-backed, validated SBOMs from one real release
  • Vulnerability context: matching with confidence, KEV/EPSS, reachability
  • Evidence-gap assessment and CRA-oriented coverage map
  • Review and release-gate baseline with your policies
  • Portable reviewer bundle your customers or auditors can verify
  • A prioritised, honest list of next actions
Available today Preview components labelled

Repeat Release & Post-Market Support

  • Repeatable per-release audits in your CI
  • Release memory, drift, and gate management across versions
  • Advisory correlation against shipped releases
  • PSIRT case continuity on the experimental post-market preview
  • Supplier and customer evidence sharing with redaction
In development · design-partner track

AI-Enabled Product Evidence Track

  • Linked software and AI evidence on one release record
  • Model-artifact evidence from your real builds — available now
  • Shape the declared-AI manifest, drift, and review model as it lands
  • Standards-based AI/ML BOM output as the sharing target
  • Early access to each capability as it ships, with its real status labelled
By arrangement

Channel & Advisory Enablement

  • For embedded-security consultancies, CRA advisors, auditors, and labs
  • SBOMFlow supplies the engineering evidence pack and workflow
  • Your professional judgment stays the product — we never replace it
  • Evidence formats your reviewers can verify without installing anything

Every engagement is release-readiness support — never legal advice, and never a statement that a product is conformant.

What you’ll hold at the end

A first engagement produces artifacts, not slideware.

Evidence pack
The full artifact set from your real release, machine-readable and yours to keep in open formats — not a claim that your evidence is complete.
Coverage & gaps
Where your evidence maps to CRA-oriented requirements today, and exactly what’s missing.
Gate baseline
A release-gate configuration reflecting your actual policies, rehearsed with a dry run.
Reviewer bundle
A portable, hash-verified handoff your compliance reviewer or customer can open with nothing installed.
A straight answer
Where SBOMFlow fits your workflow, where it doesn’t yet, and what we’d build with you next.
Illustrative brand image, synthetic: a squared stack of cream linen-bound folios held by a single binder clip, with one loose vellum sheet lying beside them
Things you keep and hand on, not a deck you sit through · illustrative brand image, synthetic

Commercial questions

Asked and answered.

What does it cost?

Pricing is under validation and arranged directly while we invite a small number of design partners — it’s scoped to your product class, repositories, firmware variants, and release cadence rather than per-seat tooling. Trying the offline CLI costs nothing; access to the v0.5.0 build is by approval rather than download, and carries no charge and no commitment. Tell us about your product and we’ll come back with specifics.

How do we become a design partner?

Email hello@sbomflow.com with what you build, your build system (Yocto, Zephyr, Buildroot, or other), and where you sell. We reply with a clear yes, no, or not-yet on fit — and where it fits, a first engagement that starts from your real build, not a demo repo.

What happens to the data we share with you?

The tool itself runs in your environment, offline by default — for most engagements we never need your source at all, only the evidence outputs you choose to share. Anything you do share is used to run the engagement and nothing else. Email is currently our only intake channel precisely so there’s no hidden form pipeline behind this page.

How can we follow along?

SBOMFlow is built in the open about its status. Follow @SBOMFlow on X or Instagram, or watch What’s new for shipped, tested changes.

Get in touch

Tell us what your release process actually looks like.

Three tracks: software and connected-device release evidence, post-market / PSIRT continuity (experimental preview), and AI-enabled product evidence (in development). Advisors and investors are welcome to write too. No spam, no sequence — a person reads this inbox. Who is behind SBOMFlow

Evaluate one release · Design partners · Research · Investment · General questions · No spam